Hi Juan,
vv52_new.log.lz: 15.329:1, 0.065 ratio, 93.48% saved. ok
I prefer this one.
Can you please explain why you prefer this one? That is, instead of this:
vv52_new.log.lz: 15.329:1, 6.52% ratio, 93.48% saved. ok
In my humble opinion, I don't really see the advantage in any way
whatsoever in choosing a decimal over a percentage in this case,
especially considering the fact that a percentage is already shown for
another part of the overall value.
Best regards,
Timothy Beryl Grahek
On 09/13/2017 07:17 PM, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote:
On 08/09/17 22:45, Antonio Diaz Diaz wrote:
Dear all,
Now that I am doing changes to lzip's output, I was wondering how
useful does people find the "bits/byte" value, and if it wouldn't be
better to show the inverse compression ratio
(compressed/decompressed) instead.
I mean, what do you think about changing this
vv52_new.log.lz: 15.329:1, 0.522 bits/byte, 93.48% saved. ok
to this
vv52_new.log.lz: 15.329:1, 0.065 ratio, 93.48% saved. ok
I prefer this one.
or even to this?
vv52_new.log.lz: 15.329:1, 6.52% ratio, 93.48% saved. ok
Thanks in advance,
Antonio.
_______________________________________________
Lzip-bug mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lzip-bug
