Helo,  that seems to be too complicated. IMHO as an archiver it should be able 
to "recreate original" file with original name, time stamps and 
probably permissions (these permissions are still more debatable). That's 
my personal opinion anyway.  With meta one could utilise trailing data space 
but that would be in lzip not lziprecover - at least that's what I would 
do. Don't know only what format would be actually the best - own format or 
xml/other meta format (just a mental exercise).  Without built in mechanism I 
can see only one way - with tar:  $ tar c file.name | lzip - > 
file.name.tar.lz  which isn't the most elegant as I create "double" 
archive but that's the only way I can see.  regards
_______________________________________________
Lzip-bug mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lzip-bug

Reply via email to