El lun, 12 jun 2023 a las 13:29, Udicoudco (<[email protected]>) escribió:

> On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 11:04 AM Scott Kostyshak <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 2023-06-10 21:49, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
>
> > > >
> > > > It's because the 'blackboard' font is quite limited (to ASCII caps, I
> > > > think). If you type characters not present in that font, you get
> weird
> > > > results.
> > > >
>
> With modern math fonts (open type) the range of 'blackboard'
> characters is wider,
> and it includes small latin letters, and arabic numerals as well.
>
> > In this case, LyX creates the corresponding LaTeX code "$\mathbb{0}$",
> which is valid LaTeX. It is true that the output is counter-intuitive. I'm
> not convinced we should do anything here.
>
> With unicode-math, "$\mathbb{0}$" should be rendered as "𝟘" (U+1D7D8),
>

In PDF output, it does, but on LyX's UI it shows (I think) U+22ac: ⊬

LyX 2.4 dev build on openSUSE Leap 15.4 with Libertinus Serif as UI font.

Regards,
Ricardo



> but it seems that  LyX is not aware of that. Attached is an example.
> Should I open
> a ticket? I don't currently have access to my Linux machine, and can't
> test it with master.
>
> Regards,
> Udi
>
> > --
> > lyx-users mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users
> --
> lyx-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users
>
-- 
lyx-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users

Reply via email to