On 01-08-17 11:40, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
On Tuesday, August 01, 2017 18:04 JST, Sjoerd <[email protected]> wrote:
On 30-07-17 17:15, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
Bug or a feature?
# lxc network create dev
error: Failed to run: ip link add dev type bridge: Error: either "dev" is duplicate, or
"bridge" is a garbage.
# lxc network create devel
Network devel created
I vote for feature, since dev is most likely a reserved word, since it's
short for device in routing terms.
Unless someone has i.e. "prod" and "dev" environments.
Unrelate imho. In this case you're trying to create a network, which
implies routing commands under the hood, so than I find it logical that
dev can't be used as name.
i.e. setting routing can be done like : ip route add 192.168.10.0/24 via
10.2.2.1 dev eth0
But that's a different command.
Yes, but as stated above...you're creating a network device, which needs
routing applied.
So I can imagine (but for details the developers might be better to
explain), that lxc (a front-end) will use the ip route command under the
hood to apply the IP address/routing like : ip route add 192.168.1.0/24
dev lxdbr1. Just take a look at the output of "ip route list"
_______________________________________________
lxc-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
