On 30 September 2013 14:25, Paul K <[email protected]> wrote: >> http://luarocks.org/repositories/contrib-bin-5.2/. There are also >> concerns with external library dependencies: how should that work on >> Windows with regard to binary rocks? > > I think the most important dependency is the Lua interpreter; on > Windows the modules are compiled against a Lua dll. The naming of that > dll is critical as if it's not named the same way as the Lua dll being > used by the app, the module won't be loaded (or if the dll is copied, > it will end up with two Lua interpreters loaded). This can be somewhat > fixed with a proxy dll, but it probably should not be used in "normal" > circumstances. > > I think it would be best to settle on one naming scheme; for example, > lua51.dll, lua52.dll and so on (and possibly the same for OSX: > lua51.dylib).
As of the last release, the LuaRocks zip includes lua51.dll (167936 bytes) and lua51.dll (11264 bytes). -- Hisham ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ October Webinars: Code for Performance Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance. Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60133471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Luarocks-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/luarocks-developers
