I've wondered the same thing, about JSON libraries. I generally just leave
it out of the rockspec and put it in the installation instructions, but
that isn't a great solution.
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 6:13 AM, steve donovan <[email protected]>wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Pierre Chapuis <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> strings in the dependencies table so if we allow tables
>> to mean alternative dependencies it would not break any
>> existing rockspec, would it?
>>
>
> Hisham checks rockspecs thoroughly, so we can't just sneak in a feature ;)
>
> However, it is again time to discuss a new version of the rockspec format.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Get 100% visibility into Java/.NET code with AppDynamics Lite!
> It's a free troubleshooting tool designed for production.
> Get down to code-level detail for bottlenecks, with <2% overhead.
> Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes.
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897031&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> _______________________________________________
> Luarocks-developers mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/luarocks-developers
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Get 100% visibility into Java/.NET code with AppDynamics Lite!
It's a free troubleshooting tool designed for production.
Get down to code-level detail for bottlenecks, with <2% overhead.
Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897031&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Luarocks-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/luarocks-developers
