BTW, I just caught a last-minute error in this rc1. To install it _not_ as a rock, there's a typo: you need to type 'make built; make install'. The next rc will use 'make build; make install'.
-- Hisham http://hisham.hm/ On 2 July 2013 23:30, Hisham <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi there, > > Here's the first release candidate of LuaRocks 2.1.0, which features > bugfixes and new features. > > This improves the use of LuaRocks with both Lua 5.1 and 5.2 > installations, reporting search results based on the Lua version > you're using. It is also the first version that advertises the option > of installing itself as a rock (on Unix platforms for now). > > This is a release candidate: if no problems are reported, these > packages will be renamed into the final versions. > > http://luarocks.org/releases/luarocks-2.1.0-rc1.tar.gz > http://luarocks.org/releases/luarocks-2.1.0-rc1-win32.zip > > What's new since 2.0.13: > > * accesses manifest-{5.1,5.2} in remote servers to provide filtered results > * 'make bootstrap' is now an advertised option > * security config options 'accepted_build_types' and 'hooks_enabled' > * 'lua_version' is now available as a global for your config.lua > * new flags --lr-path, --lr-cpath, --lr-bin for 'luarocks path' for > use in scripts > * friendlier error messages > * plus bugfixes > > As usual, see the GitHub logs for detailed history. > > And as always, any kind of feedback for this release candidate is much > appreciated. > > -- Hisham > http://hisham.hm/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Luarocks-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/luarocks-developers
