> -----Original Message----- > From: Doug Currie [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: maandag 6 mei 2013 21:29 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Luarocks-developers] Hostile rockspec takeover > > > On May 6, 2013, at 2:41 PM, Philipp Janda <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I want to start a discussion, what (if anything) can be done to improve > > the state of luarocks for Lua 5.2. Is releasing a rockspec that patches > > other people's code ok? Should we modify rockspecs fixing the > > dependencies of other people's rocks? > > I am in favor of a rule (despite the fact that I've retroactively violated > it) that no rockspec may be posted on the official repositories unless it > specifies a maximum compatible version of Lua. > > I'd also have no objection if, after some warning period to rockspecs > authors, rockspecs that only specify "lua >= 5.1" are changed to "lua >= > 5.1, < 5.2"
+1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their applications. This 200-page book is written by three acclaimed leaders in the field. The early access version is available now. Download your free book today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/neotech_d2d_may _______________________________________________ Luarocks-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/luarocks-developers
