Hi there,
I have slightly fixed the modules to behave correctly regarding "require" and
global env.
Now I stumble on something I was really not expecting: what is the proper way
to test my modules against lua 5.2 ?
Installing is OK (even if it overwrites /usr/local/bin/lua). Now I have three
binaries to test "lua", "lua5.2" and "luajit". The problem is ... luarocks.
$ luarocks install luafilesystem --lua-version=5.2
...
luafilesystem 1.6.2-1 is now built and installed in /usr/local/
$ lua5.2
> require 'lfs'
stdin:1: module 'lfs' not found:
no field package.preload['lfs']
no file '/usr/local/share/lua/5.2/lfs.lua'
no file '/usr/local/share/lua/5.2/lfs/init.lua'
no file '/usr/local/lib/lua/5.2/lfs.lua'
no file '/usr/local/lib/lua/5.2/lfs/init.lua'
no file './lfs.lua'
no file '/usr/local/lib/lua/5.2/lfs.so'
no file '/usr/local/lib/lua/5.2/loadall.so'
no file './lfs.so'
stack traceback:
[C]: in function 'require'
stdin:1: in main chunk
[C]: in ?
Lua 5.2 was released nearly a year and a half ago. I am not expecting "early
adopter" difficulties or maybe there is something important I am missing here...
Having "lua/5.1" in the load paths was very promising concerning lua version
change (ruby people need strange tools like rbenv to solve this). I really
would like to write "lua >= 5.1, < 5.3" in my rockspec dependecies...
Any hint ?
Gaspard Bucher
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Minimize network downtime and maximize team effectiveness.
Reduce network management and security costs.Learn how to hire
the most talented Cisco Certified professionals. Visit the
Employer Resources Portal
http://www.cisco.com/web/learning/employer_resources/index.html
_______________________________________________
Luarocks-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/luarocks-developers
