On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 8:56 AM, steve donovan
<[email protected]> wrote:
> This would really improve the capabilities of the builtin build mode.
> Then it would be easier to persuade people not to bundle makefiles and
> actually use LuaRocks as a build system.
Here is another small improvement possible, without actually breaking
compatibility much.
Say we have a build system that builds but doesn't try to install. So
we have the problem of _portably_ copying shared libaries in
build.install.lib. It can be done with per-platform overrides, but an
easier option would be to for LR to provide the missing extension. So
we'd get:
build = {
type = "command",
build_command = 'lake',
install = {
lib = {
'mylib'
}
}
}
Currently LR can't find 'mylib', but in the case of no extension,
append .dll or .so as appropriate.
Since I have a build system that doesn't install (Lake) I naturally am
interested in anything that makes this simpler ;) (Lake is nice
because it can be given as a dependency in a rockspec)
steve d.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Symantec Endpoint Protection 12 positioned as A LEADER in The Forrester
Wave(TM): Endpoint Security, Q1 2013 and "remains a good choice" in the
endpoint security space. For insight on selecting the right partner to
tackle endpoint security challenges, access the full report.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/symantec-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Luarocks-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/luarocks-developers
