Hi!
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/sbrk/sbrk02.c
> b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/sbrk/sbrk02.c
> index caa8537..5e9d4b8 100644
> --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/sbrk/sbrk02.c
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/sbrk/sbrk02.c
> @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ static void sbrk_verify(void);
> static void cleanup(void);
> static int exp_enos[] = { ENOMEM, 0 };
>
> -static long increment;
> +static long increment = INC;
>
> int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> {
> @@ -60,12 +60,19 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
>
> static void setup(void)
> {
> + void *ret = NULL;
> +
> tst_sig(NOFORK, DEF_HANDLER, cleanup);
>
> TEST_PAUSE;
>
> - for (increment = INC; errno == 0; increment+=INC)
> - sbrk(increment);
> + /* call sbrk until it fails or increment overflows */
> + while (ret != (void *)-1 && increment > 0) {
> + ret = sbrk(increment);
> + increment += INC;
> + }
> + tst_resm(TINFO | TERRNO, "setup() bailing inc: %ld, ret: %p, sbrk: %p",
> + increment, ret, sbrk(0));
>
> errno = 0;
Ok, this fixes the inifinite loop, but doesn't the testcase still fail
afterwards? The sbrk_verify() expects it to fail with ENOMEM and when
the setup fails to prepare the condition it may not fail, or am I
mistaken?
--
Cyril Hrubis
[email protected]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Slashdot TV.
Video for Nerds. Stuff that matters.
http://tv.slashdot.org/
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
