----- Original Message -----
> From: "Stanislav Kholmanskikh" <[email protected]>
> To: "Xiong Zhou" <[email protected]>, [email protected]
> Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2014 10:14:16 PM
> Subject: Re: [LTP][PATCH v3 1/3] fcntl16: Skip fcntl16 tests on NFS
> 
> Hi!
> 
> On 08/21/2014 08:12 AM, Xiong Zhou wrote:
> >
> > According to nfs(5), NLM supports advisory file locks only. So skip
> > fcntl16 test if NFS.
> >
> 
> I've just took a fresh look at fcntl16.c and found that block1  of this
> test case may be executed on NFS. And, IMHO, this block1 test case is
> not 100% implemented by other fcntl*.c tests.
> 
> So I think that it will be more correct to have only block2, block3 skipped.
> 

Yes, You are right. I should take more care of this earlier. And I am the 
person who should be Sorry. :)

> Sorry. I had to figure it out at the first time. :(
> 
> Thank you.
> 
> PS: And you pointed me one interesting issue.
> 
> The patch:
> 
> commit 5387ba03ce8eaddc7ec330ed03e579eed92596cc
> Author: subrata_modak <subrata_modak>
> Date:   Mon May 5 08:49:34 2008 +0000
> 
>      These test cases fail on the NFS environment due to NFS relates
> issue(s). Hence abondon these tests when NFS is detected. By, Sridhar
> Vinay <[email protected]>.
> 
> disabled entire tests and not particular test cases. And I think it's
> not quite correct, because some of the test cases may be executed on NFS.
> 
> For example, fcntl14.c has 4 test blocks, and only one of them doesn't
> work with NFS - block2 (mandatory locking).
> 
> Reviewing/fixing other fcntl*.c test cases looks like a useful activity.
> But for a later time :)

Thanks for pointing this out, I will take a look at this later.

Regards,
xzhou

> 
> 
> > Signed-off-by: Xiong Zhou <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >   testcases/kernel/syscalls/fcntl/fcntl16.c | 8 ++++++++
> >   1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/fcntl/fcntl16.c
> > b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/fcntl/fcntl16.c
> > index 44b6a80..7dba6ea 100644
> > --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/fcntl/fcntl16.c
> > +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/fcntl/fcntl16.c
> > @@ -51,6 +51,8 @@
> >   #include <sys/types.h>
> >   #include <sys/wait.h>
> >
> > +#include "tst_fs_type.h"
> > +
> >   #define SKIPVAL 0x0f00
> >   //#define       SKIP    SKIPVAL, 0, 0L, 0L, IGNORED
> >   #define SKIP 0,0,0L,0L,0
> > @@ -412,6 +414,12 @@ void setup(void)
> >
> >     tst_tmpdir();
> >
> > +   /* On NFS or not */
> > +   if (tst_fs_type(cleanup, ".") == TST_NFS_MAGIC) {
> > +           tst_brkm(TCONF, cleanup, "Cannot test madatory locking "
> > +                   "on a file located on an NFS filesystem");
> > +   }
> > +
> >     /* set up temp filename */
> >     sprintf(tmpname, "fcntl4.%d", parent);
> >
> >
> 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Slashdot TV.  
Video for Nerds.  Stuff that matters.
http://tv.slashdot.org/
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list

Reply via email to