Hi Deb, > On Mar 28, 2025, at 9:30 AM, Deb Cooley via Datatracker <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Deb Cooley has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-ospf-sr-yang-34: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to > https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ > for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-sr-yang/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > Thank you to Corey Bonnell for his secdir review. > > I do agree that the lack of narrative text makes this difficult to review. > > Section 3: If the template is changed (see M. Boucadair's review), then (or > Paul) will re-review this section.
I have updated to the RFC8407BIS template as suggested in -37. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis/ > > Section 3, para 1: If TLS is used, is mutual authentication mandated? If > not, > why not? With the updated template, TLS is only referenced as an example of a secure transport protocol. Talk to Med if you think this should be added to the template. Thanks, Acee > > > _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
