The next session of the Proof-Theoretic Semantics Seminar Series is coming 
up! This is a series of periodic online talks delivered by early career 
researchers working in proof-theoretic semantics or akin fields, organised 
by the PTS-Network.

On *Tuesday, December 9, 11am (UTC+0) Masanobu Toyooka (Tohoku University) 
will present his work with the title "Categoricity and Expressibility of 
Classical Connectives"*.

Here is the abstract:
"This talk explores the categoricity and the expressibility of classical 
connectives, inspired by the studies of Carnap, Gabbay, and Garson. In 
1943, Carnap observed that the classical single-succedent consequence 
relation did not ``carve out'' the two-valued truth table of disjunction, 
implication, or negation. This phenomenon, which is currently called ``the 
categoricity problem'', may be regarded as problematic for a moderate 
inferentialist who advocates classical logic but refuses semantic holism. 
Gabbay (1978) generalized Carnap's study and dealt with an arbitrary 
n-place connective having the two-valued truth table. In the paper, the 
existence of a single-succedent consequence relation that carves out the 
truth table of a connective is investigated.

After the studies of Carnap and Gabbay, Garson (2001, 2010) investigated 
which semantic clause was carved out by the set of rules for a connective 
in the natural deduction system rather than by the classical 
single-succedent consequence relation. In order to interpret a rule, two 
different measures were considered: ``global measure'' and ``local 
measure''. Garson revealed that these two measures carved out different 
semantic clauses for a connective.

This talk deals with an arbitrary n-place connective having the two-valued 
truth table and observes the possibility of carving out the truth table, as 
Gabbay did. However, our approach diverges from Gabbay's one in the 
following two points: (i) we work not only on a consequence relation but 
also on a rule, as Garson did, both global and local measures being 
employed to interpret it; (ii) we do not limit our attention to 
single-succedent syntactic objects but introduce four different forms of 
syntactic objects. These treatments generate various benchmarks of the 
possibility of carving out the two-valued truth table for a connective. In 
the conclusion, it is revealed which connective has the two-valued truth 
table that can be carved out according to each benchmark."

*We will send the Zoom link over the PTS mailing list 
<https://groups.google.com/g/pts-network> on the day before the session.*

Please make sure you *convert the time correctly to your specific time 
zone!*

All the best,
Sara Ayhan, Hermógenes Oliveira, Antonio Piccolomini d'Aragona & Will 
Stafford

-- 
LOGICA-L
Lista acadêmica brasileira dos profissionais e estudantes da área de Lógica 
<[email protected]>
--- 
Você está recebendo esta mensagem porque se inscreveu no grupo "LOGICA-L" dos 
Grupos do Google.
Para cancelar inscrição nesse grupo e parar de receber e-mails dele, envie um 
e-mail para [email protected].
Para ver esta conversa, acesse 
https://groups.google.com/a/dimap.ufrn.br/d/msgid/logica-l/11caef25-0b5d-4e69-ab6c-6c366be35a2fn%40dimap.ufrn.br.

Responder a