We are glad to announce the winner of the Alfred Tarski Logic Prize for
Poland 2025:
https://www.uni-log.org/alfred-tarski-prize-of-logic-2025.html

Piotr Lukowski, Jagiellonian University,  Krakow, Poland
Title of the paper: Universal Principle of Consistency
Abstract: Around 300 BCE, a debate emerged concerning the truth conditions
of conditional propositions—a debate that, to this day, has not culminated
in a formulation genuinely satisfying to philosophers. Nevertheless, the
material implication proposed by Philo the Dialectician achieved
considerable prominence, despite its evident divergence from the patterns
of ordinary human reasoning. Its success may be attributed, at least in
part, to its formal simplicity. It is now widely acknowledged, however,
that Philo’s implication is not the long-sought representation of
implication that would faithfully capture intuitive reasoning. This
recognition is underscored by the vigorous development of formal logic,
much of which has been driven by the search for a notion of implication
that aligns more closely with our cognitive intuitions. As Susan Haack once
remarked, a true solution to a philosophical problem is recognizable by the
deep internal conviction it evokes regarding its adequacy. Arguably, none
of the proposed definitions of implication to date have elicited such
conviction, not even among their originators—hence, the search continues.
The present study introduces a principle that appears to underlie human
reasoning regardless of its subject matter—whether one is engaged in
mathematical theorizing or reflecting on matters of everyday life, the same
logical structure, the same inferential tool, seems to be consistently
employed. We propose that this tool is the Universal Principle of
Consistency (UPC), or, in its strengthened form, the Strong Universal
Principle of Consistency (SUPC). This universal principle is derived from
the definitions of two content-based implications: the hyperintensional
content inclusion implication and the intensional content relationship
implication. Both appear to align closely with the structure of ordinary
reasoning, both resonate with the logical intuitions of the
Ancients—particularly Chrysippus and Diodorus—and both prove effective in
domains such as legal and mathematical reasoning. Moreover, they offer a
precise account of key pragmatic phenomena, including presupposition and
implicatures.
If the proposal put forward here is accurate, it may be argued that it
brings to a close the debate that began in antiquity.

This paper will be published in the journal Logica Universalis
and presented at the 8th UNILOG in Cusco at the 3rd World Logic Prizes
Contest
https://sites.google.com/view/unilog2025/logic-prizes

Jean-Yves Beziau
Federal University of Rio de Janeiro
https://philpeople.org/profiles/jean-yves-beziau

Project
 A PRIZE OF LOGIC IN EVERY COUNTRY !
https://www.uni-log.org/logic-prize-world

-- 
LOGICA-L
Lista acadêmica brasileira dos profissionais e estudantes da área de Lógica 
<[email protected]>
--- 
Você está recebendo esta mensagem porque se inscreveu no grupo "LOGICA-L" dos 
Grupos do Google.
Para cancelar inscrição nesse grupo e parar de receber e-mails dele, envie um 
e-mail para [email protected].
Para ver esta conversa, acesse 
https://groups.google.com/a/dimap.ufrn.br/d/msgid/logica-l/CAF2zFLDytzEkXg6UAdNuMySojz%2BT8Hyf87Cd_c_OFjcCsmC9zA%40mail.gmail.com.

Responder a