---------- Forwarded message ---------

The last decade had shown that philosophers became more aware of the
importance of finding an adequate methodology of philosophy. This is
partly reflected in the growing number of works, which aim taking into
consideration the tension between what seems to be excluding
alternatives approaches towards this problem. Thus, there are debates
over adequacy, limits, and applications of formal and informal
methods, naturalism and anti-naturalism, experimental and armchair
philosophy. Importantly, this resulted not merely in vivid
metaphilosophical debates over competitive approaches towards methods
of philosophy, but also in the development of new approaches towards
particular ‘old’ philosophical questions. Hence, one notices a growing
number of formal analyses of the key philosophical notions of truth,
belief, existence, imagination, or modality, as well as a growing
number of experimental research. Others argue that blindly applied
formal methods can result in oversimplifying the subject of
philosophical investigation and that the application of experimental
methods in philosophy results in changing the ‘love of wisdom’ into
the ‘love of surveys.’ Finally, others put into question the very idea
that there is only one correct method of doing philosophy.

In virtue of the variety of possible approaches towards the question
of philosophical methods, we would like to discuss this question
during a workshop. We invite submissions for a 40-minute presentation
(this includes a time for a discussion) linked to the question of
methods of philosophy. Examples of relevant themes include (but are
not limited to):

conceptual engineering,
formal/informal methods in philosophy,
naturalism/anti-naturalism in philosophy,
experimental/armchair philosophy,
the paradox of analysis,
inference to the best explanation,
methods of particular philosophical disciplines.


Keynote Speakers:
Sven Ove Hansson (Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm)
Hannes Leitgeb (Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München)
Stephen Neale (The City University of New York)
Leszek Wroński (Jagiellonian University)


Submission details:
The submission deadline: 29/02/2020
Notification of acceptance: 01/04/2020

Submissions should contain two files and should be sent to
[[email protected]]:

(1) An abstract of no more than 750 words. The abstract should include
the title of the presentation, bibliography and be suitable for a
blind review.
(2) A file with the title of the paper, the author's name,
affiliation, and e-mail address.

Since we would like to put a stress on the workshop character of this
meeting, after the selection of accepted papers, each speaker will be
kindly asked to send a more advanced version (up to 3 000 words) of
her presentation till the 15th of May. These will be sent to other
participants, which will allow them to know papers in more detail.
Furthermore, this will open an opportunity for extending the schedule
by commentaries. Thus, accepted participants might be asked to prepare
a short comment on another paper. The final decision on including a
round of commentaries will be made after the selection of accepted
papers.

The participation in the workshop is free but registration is required
(in order to register as a non-presenting participant, one is kindly
asked to send an e-mail to: [email protected] by the 01/06/2020).

Notice that the workshop is preceded by The third Context, Cognition
and Communication Conference: http://ccc-conference.org/index.html

Organizers:
Maciej Sendłak (Institute of Philosophy, University of Warsaw)
Paweł Grabarczyk (Institute of Philosophy, University of Łódź & IT Copenhagen)
Tadeusz Ciecierski (Institute of philosophy, University of Warsaw)

-- 
Você está recebendo esta mensagem porque se inscreveu no grupo "LOGICA-L" dos 
Grupos do Google.
Para cancelar inscrição nesse grupo e parar de receber e-mails dele, envie um 
e-mail para [email protected].
Para ver esta discussão na web, acesse 
https://groups.google.com/a/dimap.ufrn.br/d/msgid/logica-l/CAO6j_Lg%2B3vJ6w2cXOQJrxYjwaL2LmciK4W2UxUOthAxnAXqTEQ%40mail.gmail.com.

Responder a