On 05/08/2014 03:17 PM, Tobiasz Karoń wrote: > > I think even before we get on the LV2 plugins format, we still have > some work to do in the LADSPA field first. > > What do you think? How hard could these two be to implement? > >
I don't think they should be too hard... For combo selectors, we can use our already existing comboboxes, to keep the UI consistent. I haven't looked at this part of the LADSPA spec so I'm not sure how much work it would be to implement this. Feedback meters are a bit more tricky, we don't have such meters anywhere besides the FX mixer, so we'd first need to implement a more generic volume meter widget which could be used all over the software (and maybe rebase the FX mixer meters on it so they can reuse the same code...) This would be useful to do in any case, as there are other places they could be useful in besides LADSPA plugins. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ "Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos. Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free." http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs _______________________________________________ LMMS-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel
