That's a good point. A lot of pro level LMMS artists (flatteringly
including myself) use other software in combination with LMMS. Many of my
tracks use Audacity for vocal insertion and Ardour2 for mastering. I think
it should require primarily LMMS, but allow open-source post production.
On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 4:37 PM, oeai <[email protected]> wrote:
> for me it's just a case of used soft, because if i had to write it only
> with lmms or just produce few sounds but then go to logic,cub,able -
> it's kinda ... unfair maybe.
> so for me the contest is in using open source software only and to prove
> it, well sending a project would be enough. but if there's no such need,
> then well it's up to the artist really.
> should be right tho
>
> On 12.01.2014 01:01, Vesa wrote:
> > I think it should be up to the artist.
>
>
> --
> OEAI
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services.
> Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For
> Critical Workloads, Development Environments & Everything In Between.
> Get a Quote or Start a Free Trial Today.
>
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=119420431&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> _______________________________________________
> LMMS-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel
>
--
Johnny
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services.
Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For
Critical Workloads, Development Environments & Everything In Between.
Get a Quote or Start a Free Trial Today.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=119420431&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
LMMS-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel
