llvmbot wrote:

<!--LLVM PR SUMMARY COMMENT-->

@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-risc-v

Author: Aiden Grossman (boomanaiden154)

<details>
<summary>Changes</summary>

This should prevent the flaky failures that have been plaguing the
buildbots since the test was introduced and allow for offline
investigation without disrupting CI.


---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/170014.diff


1 Files Affected:

- (modified) llvm/test/tools/llvm-exegesis/RISCV/rvv/filter.test (+5-3) 


``````````diff
diff --git a/llvm/test/tools/llvm-exegesis/RISCV/rvv/filter.test 
b/llvm/test/tools/llvm-exegesis/RISCV/rvv/filter.test
index 858569e4b0ef5..3815e281876e2 100644
--- a/llvm/test/tools/llvm-exegesis/RISCV/rvv/filter.test
+++ b/llvm/test/tools/llvm-exegesis/RISCV/rvv/filter.test
@@ -1,7 +1,9 @@
+# TODO(mshockwave): We use a fixed seed for this test because sometimes it
+# will fail to generate any snippet because it is unable to assign unique
+# def and use registers.
 # RUN: llvm-exegesis -mtriple=riscv64 -mcpu=sifive-x280 
-benchmark-phase=assemble-measured-code --mode=inverse_throughput 
--opcode-name=PseudoVNCLIPU_WX_M1_MASK \
-# RUN:    --riscv-filter-config='vtype = {VXRM: rod, AVL: VLMAX, SEW: e(8|16), 
Policy: ta/mu}' --max-configs-per-opcode=1000 --min-instructions=10 | FileCheck 
%s
-# Sometimes it'll fail to generate any snippet because it's unable to assign 
unique def and use registers.
-# ALLOW_RETRIES: 2
+# RUN:    --riscv-filter-config='vtype = {VXRM: rod, AVL: VLMAX, SEW: e(8|16), 
Policy: ta/mu}' --max-configs-per-opcode=1000 --min-instructions=10 \
+# RUN:    -random-generator-seed=5 | FileCheck %s
 
 # CHECK: config:          'vtype = {VXRM: rod, AVL: VLMAX, SEW: e8, Policy: 
ta/mu}'
 # CHECK: config:          'vtype = {VXRM: rod, AVL: VLMAX, SEW: e16, Policy: 
ta/mu}'

``````````

</details>


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/170014
_______________________________________________
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits

Reply via email to