matthias-springer wrote: > Seems to me that this is a case where we would insert a "unreachable" > terminator instead?
I like this approach. This allows us to fix the `-remove-dead-values` pass without having to run a second analysis such as "finding dead symbols" -- the pass stays relatively simple. I updated the pull request accordingly. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/169269 _______________________________________________ llvm-branch-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
