github-actions[bot] wrote:
<!--LLVM CODE FORMAT COMMENT: {clang-format}-->
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
<details>
<summary>
You can test this locally with the following command:
</summary>
``````````bash
git-clang-format --diff origin/main HEAD --extensions h,cpp --
bolt/include/bolt/Core/MCPlusBuilder.h
bolt/lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64MCPlusBuilder.cpp
bolt/unittests/Core/MCPlusBuilder.cpp --diff_from_common_commit
``````````
:warning:
The reproduction instructions above might return results for more than one PR
in a stack if you are using a stacked PR workflow. You can limit the results by
changing `origin/main` to the base branch/commit you want to compare against.
:warning:
</details>
<details>
<summary>
View the diff from clang-format here.
</summary>
``````````diff
diff --git a/bolt/lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64MCPlusBuilder.cpp
b/bolt/lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64MCPlusBuilder.cpp
index b92e5b2df..eb91346bb 100644
--- a/bolt/lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64MCPlusBuilder.cpp
+++ b/bolt/lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64MCPlusBuilder.cpp
@@ -2773,7 +2773,6 @@ public:
Inst.getOpcode() == AArch64::PACIBSP;
}
-
void updateBTIVariant(MCInst &Inst, bool CallTarget,
bool JumpTarget) const override {
assert(Inst.getOpcode() == AArch64::HINT && "Not a BTI instruction.");
``````````
</details>
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/167308
_______________________________________________
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
