ojhunt wrote: > @pcc and I have been discussing this. > > * The perf issues I was concerned about were predicated on access to a > pointer loaded from a field continuing to be checked after the original field > load, this is not the case (and in hindsight doing so would imply passing the > pointer as a parameter to a function would maintain the tag and require the > target knowing about it).
For people following along, despite multiple different places saying the symbol resolution is static, I'm a muppet and thought this was a dynamic link check, hence had all sorts of problems. However it's a static link time check, so I'm a muppet and many of my concerns are irrelevant. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133538 _______________________________________________ llvm-branch-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
