================
@@ -410,6 +366,21 @@ bool Vocabulary::invalidate(Module &M, const
PreservedAnalyses &PA,
return !(PAC.preservedWhenStateless());
}
+Vocabulary::VocabVector Vocabulary::createDummyVocabForTest(unsigned Dim) {
+ VocabVector DummyVocab;
+ DummyVocab.reserve(NumCanonicalEntries);
+ float DummyVal = 0.1f;
+ // Create a dummy vocabulary with entries for all opcodes, types, and
+ // operands
+ for ([[maybe_unused]] unsigned _ :
----------------
boomanaiden154 wrote:
If it's consistent with the rest of the file I guess it's fine. Really not a
big fan of a range based for loop that needs `[[maybe_unused]]` on the value
though.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/155323
_______________________________________________
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
