================
@@ -974,6 +974,11 @@ AArch64TTIImpl::getIntrinsicInstrCost(const
IntrinsicCostAttributes &ICA,
}
break;
}
+ case Intrinsic::loop_dependence_raw_mask:
+ case Intrinsic::loop_dependence_war_mask:
+ if (ST->hasSVE2())
+ return 1;
+ return InstructionCost::getInvalid(CostKind);
----------------
SamTebbs33 wrote:
The intrinsics do expand into a [lot of
instructions](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117007/files#diff-d7065626b3d269e24241429ce037d51fc91d5ead5896d67fcc038aefc1111fd2R1806),
so I'm keen to hear people's opinions on whether invalid is better than
calculating the cost of them, since that will probably be very high.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100579
_______________________________________________
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
