nikic wrote:

Ah, I didn't realize that it's always based on op_end.

Maybe this change is not actually that bad if combined with the new 
successors() representation? Then the successors iterator is not going to 
through through getSuccessor() anymore and it will have less impact?

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/151673
_______________________________________________
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits

Reply via email to