MaskRay wrote: > The current code is quite crusty and divergent from non-MIPS in API use, but > fixing it up like this is quite high-risk, especially given how weird the > MIPS GOT is when it comes to the required initial memory state. Is anyone > using LLD for MIPS these days who can test this in a wider context? I've > tried to be very careful but I would not be surprised if I've made mistakes; > our test coverage isn't great.
I believe only one company is still actively contributing to the MIPS backend in LLVM... @wzssyqa Besides the ClangBuiltLinux maintainer continues to support MIPS. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150730 _______________________________________________ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
