hanhanW wrote: > think you should drop @2548809 from this PR, so we could handle #150127 > separately :) Or target that branch from this one if you're planning to get > that one in first. Otherwise LGTM.
I need to land the other one first. Otherwise, the CI is not happy. I recreate the other PR because the branch needs to live in upstream and it has to associate to a PR: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150272 > It is possible to create branches in llvm/llvm-project/ that start with > users/<username>/, however this is intended to be able to support “stacked” > pull-request. Do not create any branches in the llvm/llvm-project repository > otherwise, please use a fork (see above). User branches that aren’t > associated with a pull-request will be deleted. https://llvm.org/docs/GitHub.html#branches https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149624 _______________________________________________ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
