================
@@ -2128,6 +2128,161 @@ genLoopOp(lower::AbstractConverter &converter, 
lower::SymMap &symTable,
   return loopOp;
 }
 
+static mlir::omp::CanonicalLoopOp
+genCanonicalLoopOp(lower::AbstractConverter &converter, lower::SymMap 
&symTable,
+                   semantics::SemanticsContext &semaCtx,
+                   lower::pft::Evaluation &eval, mlir::Location loc,
+                   const ConstructQueue &queue,
+                   ConstructQueue::const_iterator item,
+                   llvm::ArrayRef<const semantics::Symbol *> ivs,
+                   llvm::omp::Directive directive, DataSharingProcessor &dsp) {
+  fir::FirOpBuilder &firOpBuilder = converter.getFirOpBuilder();
+
+  assert(ivs.size() == 1 && "Nested loops not yet implemented");
+  const semantics::Symbol *iv = ivs[0];
+
+  auto &nestedEval = eval.getFirstNestedEvaluation();
+  if (nestedEval.getIf<parser::DoConstruct>()->IsDoConcurrent()) {
+    TODO(loc, "Do Concurrent in unroll construct");
+  }
----------------
Meinersbur wrote:

OpenMP 6.0 specifies DO CONCURRENT only with the `!omp loop` construct. At this 
stage will not support it for any `omp.canonical_loop`. Changed the TODO 
message.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144785
_______________________________________________
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits

Reply via email to