================
@@ -2128,6 +2128,161 @@ genLoopOp(lower::AbstractConverter &converter,
lower::SymMap &symTable,
return loopOp;
}
+static mlir::omp::CanonicalLoopOp
+genCanonicalLoopOp(lower::AbstractConverter &converter, lower::SymMap
&symTable,
+ semantics::SemanticsContext &semaCtx,
+ lower::pft::Evaluation &eval, mlir::Location loc,
+ const ConstructQueue &queue,
+ ConstructQueue::const_iterator item,
+ llvm::ArrayRef<const semantics::Symbol *> ivs,
+ llvm::omp::Directive directive, DataSharingProcessor &dsp) {
+ fir::FirOpBuilder &firOpBuilder = converter.getFirOpBuilder();
+
+ assert(ivs.size() == 1 && "Nested loops not yet implemented");
+ const semantics::Symbol *iv = ivs[0];
+
+ auto &nestedEval = eval.getFirstNestedEvaluation();
+ if (nestedEval.getIf<parser::DoConstruct>()->IsDoConcurrent()) {
+ TODO(loc, "Do Concurrent in unroll construct");
+ }
----------------
Meinersbur wrote:
OpenMP 6.0 specifies DO CONCURRENT only with the `!omp loop` construct. At this
stage will not support it for any `omp.canonical_loop`. Changed the TODO
message.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144785
_______________________________________________
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
