mikaelholmen wrote:

> @mikaelholmen @mstorsjo @macurtis-amd @sjoerdmeijer @sushgokh We've decided 
> that it's best to revert the original PR (see #146850), sorry for wasting 
> your time. This PR is trying to reintroduce it with fixes to the issues 
> you've presented. Can I humbly ask you to test this commit one final time?

I've re-tested the cases I've reported problems for with this patch on top of 
our downstream compiler based on trunk version c79fcfee41 and they still work.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/146806
_______________________________________________
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits

Reply via email to