fmayer wrote: > There's a flag: > > ``` > LSAN_FLAG(bool, use_ld_allocations, true, > "Root set: mark as reachable all allocations made from dynamic " > "linker. This was the old way to handle dynamic TLS, and will " > "be removed soon. Do not use this flag.") > ``` > > Obviously we shouldn't use this flag, but I wonder if something like that > would be better than specifically suppressing `*dlerror*` (are other `dl*` > functions going to break at some point?).
Yeah, it would be better to fix the root cause. But until then, this exclusion makes sense IMO. WDYT? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/142876 _______________________________________________ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
