github-actions[bot] wrote:

<!--LLVM CODE FORMAT COMMENT: {clang-format}-->


:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code. 
:warning:

<details>
<summary>
You can test this locally with the following command:
</summary>

``````````bash
git-clang-format --diff HEAD~1 HEAD --extensions cpp -- 
llvm/tools/llvm-reduce/deltas/ReduceValuesToReturn.cpp
``````````

</details>

<details>
<summary>
View the diff from clang-format here.
</summary>

``````````diff
diff --git a/llvm/tools/llvm-reduce/deltas/ReduceValuesToReturn.cpp 
b/llvm/tools/llvm-reduce/deltas/ReduceValuesToReturn.cpp
index b4df3e6dd..72cfa8305 100644
--- a/llvm/tools/llvm-reduce/deltas/ReduceValuesToReturn.cpp
+++ b/llvm/tools/llvm-reduce/deltas/ReduceValuesToReturn.cpp
@@ -96,7 +96,6 @@ static void rewriteFuncWithReturnType(Function &OldF, Value 
*NewRetValue) {
   // result of our pruning here.
   EliminateUnreachableBlocks(OldF);
 
-
   // Drop the incompatible attributes before we copy over to the new function.
   if (OldRetTy != NewRetTy) {
     AttributeList AL = OldF.getAttributes();

``````````

</details>


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134035
_______________________________________________
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits

Reply via email to