redstar wrote: > Thinking a bit more about this, it looks to me that we should treat SD/ED/PR > on the one hand differently from LD (and ER) on the other. The former > identify a range of address space and may hold contents of those ranges in > the form of text records; the latter identify a single address (and hold no > content of their own).
Yes, that is correct. > From that perspective, the former correspond to the "section" concept, while > the latter correspond to the "symbol" concept. Now, among the section types > SD/ED/PR, GOFF is a bit special in that those are nested - this is somewhat > similar to the subsection concept, but it is explicit in the object file > format (as opposed to, say, ELF subsections). I try to implement this. Well, first I'll fix the failing test cases.... https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133799 _______________________________________________ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
