================
@@ -382,11 +382,11 @@ def ROCDL_mfma_f32_16x16x4bf16_1k : 
ROCDL_Mfma_IntrOp<"mfma.f32.16x16x4bf16.1k">
 def ROCDL_mfma_f32_4x4x4bf16_1k : ROCDL_Mfma_IntrOp<"mfma.f32.4x4x4bf16.1k">;
 def ROCDL_mfma_f32_32x32x8bf16_1k : 
ROCDL_Mfma_IntrOp<"mfma.f32.32x32x8bf16.1k">;
 def ROCDL_mfma_f32_16x16x16bf16_1k : 
ROCDL_Mfma_IntrOp<"mfma.f32.16x16x16bf16.1k">;
-// Note: in gfx940, unlike in gfx90a, the f64 xdlops use the "blgp" argument 
as a
-// NEG bitfield. See IntrinsicsAMDGPU.td for more info.
+// Note: in gfx942, unlike in gfx90a, the f64 xdlops use the "blgp" argument as
----------------
arsenm wrote:

94x?

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125836
_______________________________________________
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits

Reply via email to