evodius96 wrote: This is pertinent to #109930 from Validas as well, and they would like something like this to be included by default to make it less confusing for users of MC/DC. On the other hand, as I point out in the issue, I think introducing MC/DC for single-conditions is redundant (given branch coverage) and introduces unnecessary overhead. So, that's an argument for keeping it as a separate option and perhaps finding another way to work branch coverage into the overall MC/DC metric.
Also, Branch Coverage gives you counts for switch statement cases, whereas I'm not sure that makes sense for single-condition MC/DC, though perhaps that's overkill. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125484 _______________________________________________ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
