================
@@ -102,6 +102,7 @@ FEATURE(numerical_stability_sanitizer,
LangOpts.Sanitize.has(SanitizerKind::Nume
FEATURE(memory_sanitizer,
LangOpts.Sanitize.hasOneOf(SanitizerKind::Memory |
SanitizerKind::KernelMemory))
+FEATURE(type_sanitizer, LangOpts.Sanitize.has(SanitizerKind::Type))
----------------
AaronBallman wrote:
None of these sanitizers are features. :-( I think this is the correct thing to
do for consistency, but at the same time, we keep adding more sanitizers and we
keep making this problem worse.
Nothing to change here, just me grumbling. :-D
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76260
_______________________________________________
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
