mgorny wrote: > Correct me if I am wrong, but this seems like an added feature and not a > regression or critical fix? it's a pretty big patch and while it's most > likely is "safe" it would still fall outside our current definition of > backports?
Without this change, you can't use clang at all, because it rejects the host triplet. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112364 _______________________________________________ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
