kyulee-com wrote:

> IIRC we have several lit tests that cover structural hash, shouldn't we have 
> a new test there that uses the new functionality?

Extended the existing `StructuralHashPrinterPass` with `Options`, and updated 
the corresponding lit test accordingly.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112638
_______________________________________________
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits

Reply via email to