================
@@ -285,7 +285,75 @@ argument's type:
   specific `mlir::Attribute` subclass) will be used instead.
   - Other attribute types will be represented with their `storageType`.
 - It will create `<Name>Operands` structure for each operation, which is an
-empty structure subclassing all operand structures defined for the 
corresponding `OpenMP_Op`'s clauses.
+empty structure subclassing all operand structures defined for the 
corresponding
+`OpenMP_Op`'s clauses.
+
+### Entry Block Argument-Defining Clauses
+
+Certain OpenMP clauses introduce in their MLIR representation mappings between
----------------
bhandarkar-pranav wrote:

<Subjective review comment>Could you consider the following reordering and 
slight rewording of the first sentence?
```
In their MLIR representation, certain OpenMP clauses introduce a mapping 
between values defined outside the operation they are applied to and entry 
block arguments for the region of that MLIR operation.
```

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109811
_______________________________________________
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits

Reply via email to