rampitec wrote: > > Is it legal and defined behavior to target private memory with an atomic? > > In the IR it would have to be, and this is the expected behavior in OpenMP > and C++. It's UB in OpenCL, and UB in CUDA/HIP for old style atomics, but > defined for new std::atomic style cases
Is there a plan that OpenCL and HIP FE will produce noalias metadata to avoid the expansion? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109407 _______________________________________________ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
