wangpc-pp wrote: > > The run just finished, I'm seeing a 0.75% improvement on 500.perlbench_r on > > the BPI F3 (-O3 -mcpu=spacemit-x60), no regressions or improvements on the > > other benchmarks as far as I can see. Seems to check out with the number of > > memcmps inlined reported for perlbench! > > Does spacemit-x60 support unaligned scalar memory and was your test with or > without that enabled?
It supports unaligned scalar but not unaligned vector. And it seems we don't add these features to `-mcpu=spacemit-x60`. So I think @lukel97 ran the SPEC without unaligned scalar. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107548 _______________________________________________ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
