wzssyqa wrote: > Definitely agree it's not a regression, but I think I would quibble a bit > with the idea that taking ~1h6min to compile something that normally takes > ~3min is not a bug in some sense. đŸ™‚ >
If so, then I think that it is a real bug ;) > But ok, philosophical debates aside: Would it be reasonable to at least > consider it a [critical performance issue for the purposes of a bug fix > release](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/main/llvm/docs/HowToReleaseLLVM.rst#release-patch-rules)? > I acknowledge that there'd still need to be an assessment as to whether the > patch is safe, but it _seems_ like it should at least fit one of the criteria > on its face. In regards to safety, perhaps confidence in the patch would > increase in the time between 19.1.0-final and the subsequent bug fix releases? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106008 _______________________________________________ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
