tblah wrote: > Wouldn't applying the patterns on the module in a single pass work here as > well?
Yes that would work but we would loose parallelism. I wanted to keep that because there was talk in the past about breaking up the existing Module passes so that different functions (or other container operations) can be processed in parallel https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84953 _______________________________________________ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
