================
@@ -1031,6 +1032,22 @@ APInt llvm::possiblyDemandedEltsInMask(Value *Mask) {
return DemandedElts;
}
+InstructionCost
+llvm::getVecLibCallCost(const Instruction *I, const TargetTransformInfo *TTI,
+ const TargetLibraryInfo *TLI, VectorType *VecTy,
+ TargetTransformInfo::TargetCostKind CostKind) {
+ SmallVector<Type *, 4> OpTypes;
+ for (auto &Op : I->operands())
+ OpTypes.push_back(Op->getType());
+
+ LibFunc Func;
+ if (TLI->getLibFunc(I->getOpcode(), I->getType(), Func) &&
+ TLI->isFunctionVectorizable(TLI->getName(Func),
VecTy->getElementCount()))
+ return TTI->getCallInstrCost(nullptr, VecTy, OpTypes, CostKind);
+
+ return InstructionCost::getInvalid();
----------------
paulwalker-arm wrote:
Given you've pulled this from LoopVectorize so the "hack" is easier to track I
would rather you also update LoopVectorize to use it and thus verify existing
behaviour is honoured.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82488
_______________________________________________
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
