+LLDB Dev <lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> as well for visibility. +Pavel Labath <lab...@google.com> since he and I have talked about such things.
On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 7:26 PM David Blaikie <dblai...@gmail.com> wrote: > [+debug info folks, just as FYI - since the immediate question's more > about 3rd party library deps than the nuances of DWARF, etc] > > I'd imagine avoiding writing such a thing from scratch would be desirable, > but that the decision might depend somewhat on what libraries out there > you/we would consider including, what their licenses and further > dependencies are. > > On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 4:22 PM Petr Hosek via llvm-dev < > llvm-...@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> We're considering implementing [debuginfod]( >> https://sourceware.org/elfutils/Debuginfod.html) library in LLVM. >> Initially, we'd like to start with the client implementation, which would >> enable debuginfod support in tools like llvm-symbolizer, but later we'd >> also like to provide LLVM-based debuginfod server implementation. >> >> debuginfod uses HTTP and so we need an HTTP library, ideally one that >> supports both client and server. >> >> The question is, would it be acceptable to use an existing C++ HTTP >> library or would it be preferred to implement an HTTP library in LLVM from >> scratch? >> _______________________________________________ >> LLVM Developers mailing list >> llvm-...@lists.llvm.org >> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev >> >
_______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
