> On May 15, 2020, at 7:04 PM, Eric Christopher via lldb-dev 
> <lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> We've been testing[1] a number of patches upstream by default via some 
> pre-merge checks in phabricator. I was thinking of turning them on for lldb 
> as well. Mostly it well just help people know whether or not they've broken 
> lldb before they commit something, but won't stop committing or do anything 
> else that direction.

I am all for it! 

> Let me know what you think and otherwise I'd like to turn it on in a week or 
> so. This will also help keep the test suite a little cleaner on linux FWIW.

Please do.

> There are a few additional links down below and if you have any questions 
> send them my way.

Will the lldb tests be run automagically if and only if lldb code is modified 
in the patch? 

> 
> Thanks!
> 
> -eric
> 
> 
> [1] 
> https://github.com/google/llvm-premerge-checks/blob/master/docs/user_doc.md 
> <https://github.com/google/llvm-premerge-checks/blob/master/docs/user_doc.md>
> [2] https://reviews.llvm.org/project/members/78/ 
> <https://reviews.llvm.org/project/members/78/> 
> [3] https://github.com/google/llvm-premerge-checks/issues 
> <https://github.com/google/llvm-premerge-checks/issues>
> _______________________________________________
> lldb-dev mailing list
> lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org
> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev

_______________________________________________
lldb-dev mailing list
lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev

Reply via email to