* Zachary Turner: > I'd be curious to see if the PID of the process that is failed to > attach to is the same as one of the PIDs of a process that was > previously attached to (and if so, if it is the first such case where > a PID is recycled).
I added logging of the PID, and got this (the failure happened rather quickly this time): $ while ./test-attach ; do date ; done PID: 16658 Sat Jan 5 21:28:28 CET 2019 PID: 16831 Sat Jan 5 21:28:29 CET 2019 PID: 17006 Sat Jan 5 21:28:30 CET 2019 PID: 17176 Sat Jan 5 21:28:30 CET 2019 PID: 17351 Sat Jan 5 21:28:31 CET 2019 PID: 17526 Sat Jan 5 21:28:32 CET 2019 PID: 17700 test-attach: SBTarget::Attach failed: lost connection So there isn't any evidence of PID reuse. My lldb -p test case also triggers this with a long-running process, so there isn't any PID reuse there either. Thanks, Florian _______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
