If you are on macOS, then the Xcode build has a "Debug" configuration which builds clang/llvm Release+asserts with no debug info, and lldb at -O0 with debug info.
Jim > On Jun 28, 2018, at 2:58 AM, Pavel Labath via lldb-dev > <lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > On Thu, 28 Jun 2018 at 04:34, Adrian Harris via lldb-dev > <lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> Hi Everyone, >> >> I'm writing a gdb-server for a new architecture and need to be able to debug >> lldb to track down issues. Unfortunately disk space is tight here and the >> llvm debug build consumes north of 40Gb with debug symbols. Is there any way >> to build *only* lldb with debug symbols (and no optimization)? > > Hi Adrian, > > This is a somewhat non-standard configuration, but there are a couple > of ways you could achieve that. A couple which come to mind are: > - If you're fine with hacking the cmake files then you could just > insert something like > set(CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS "${CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS} -g0") > into the root llvm CMakeLists.txt > and then add > set(CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS "${CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS} -g") > to lldb's CMakeLists.txt > > - If you want a solution which does not involve modifying the cmake > files, you could build llvm and lldb separately. The llvm could be > built with -g0 (or even in release mode if you really want) and then > the stanalone lldb build would be -g. > > - You can also try building with -gsplit-dwarf > (LLVM_USE_SPLIT_DWARF=On) to see if that saves enough space for things > to work for you. > > pl > _______________________________________________ > lldb-dev mailing list > lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev _______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev