NP, I'll find somebody who can initiate a clean rebuild. Jim
> On Nov 7, 2017, at 10:28 AM, Pavel Labath <lab...@google.com> wrote: > > You probably just need to nuke the build folder. > > The reason for that is that before the patch the LLDB_TEST_C_COMPILER > variable was used for a different purpose (and usually empty), where > as now it's set by default to the in-tree clang. However, cmake will > not overwrite the cached value by design. (I could have worked around > that in cmake, but I only noticed that issue after landing the > change.) > > Erasing the build folder should let the new and correct default kick > in. If you run the check-lldb target then it will now use the in-tree > clang instead of the system compiler for using tests. > > sorry about the trouble, > pl > > > > On 7 November 2017 at 18:21, Jim Ingham via lldb-dev > <lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> The lldb_cmake GreenDragon bot is now failing, e.g.: >> >> http://lab.llvm.org:8080/green/view/LLDB/job/lldb_cmake/1703/consoleFull#589016626e9a0fee5-ebcc-4238-a641-c5aa112c323e >> >> This looks related to Pavel's change: >> >>> r316728 | labath | 2017-10-26 19:24:04 -0700 (Thu, 26 Oct 2017) | 18 lines >>> >>> Default to using in-tree clang for building test executables >>> >>> Summary: >>> Using the in-tree clang should be the default test configuration as that >>> is the one compiler that we can be sure everyone has (better >>> reproducibility of test results). Also, it should hopefully reduce the >>> impact of pr35040. >>> >>> This also reduces the number of settings which control the compiler >>> used. LLDB_TEST_C_COMPILER is used for C files and >>> LLDB_TEST_CXX_COMPILER for C++ files. Both of the settings default to >>> the in-tree clang. >>> >>> Reviewers: zturner >>> >>> Subscribers: mgorny, davide, lldb-commits >>> >>> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39215 >>> >> >> The error is: >> >> CMake Error at tools/lldb/CMakeLists.txt:78 (message): >> >> LLDB test compilers not specified. Tests will not run >> >> >> Does the bot need to be reconfigured for these changes? >> >> Jim >> >> _______________________________________________ >> lldb-dev mailing list >> lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org >> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev _______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
