On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 12:52 PM, Ted Woodward <ted.woodw...@codeaurora.org> wrote: > I think if clang exists in-tree, it should be used. If it doesn't, the > compiler used to build lldb should be used. > > Unless, of course, the compiler is specified with the cmake variables. >
I think that if the default is to run tests with the clang in-tree, then clang should be built as dependency. This kind of matches every other LLVM tool out there (e.g. lld relies on llvm-mc and objdump and readobj to be built), clang relies on opt to be built, etc... Best, -- Davide _______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
