> On Oct 25, 2017, at 10:44 AM, Jim Ingham via lldb-dev 
> <lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> 
> I have only one reservation to this plan, which is that at present I only 
> have one breakpoint command that shares a common set of command options.  So 
> if we start overloading the meaning of -f, meaning a file in the case of file 
> & line breakpoints and a restriction glob pattern for source regex 
> breakpoints, then it makes command help & completion work poorly.  OTOH, I 
> have no problem with -f meaning something different for "-r" breakpoints and 
> "-f, -l" breakpoints.  

err, we were actually talking about "-p" breakpoints here...

Jim

_______________________________________________
lldb-dev mailing list
lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev

Reply via email to