> On Oct 25, 2017, at 10:44 AM, Jim Ingham via lldb-dev > <lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > I have only one reservation to this plan, which is that at present I only > have one breakpoint command that shares a common set of command options. So > if we start overloading the meaning of -f, meaning a file in the case of file > & line breakpoints and a restriction glob pattern for source regex > breakpoints, then it makes command help & completion work poorly. OTOH, I > have no problem with -f meaning something different for "-r" breakpoints and > "-f, -l" breakpoints.
err, we were actually talking about "-p" breakpoints here... Jim _______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev